It appears snaps coming from the Canonical store can be installed but not useable until payment is made via paypal.
One example would be Qstamina-snap which is available from ubuntu-software.
Is this proper?
A store is something that sellsâŚ
I understand that, itâs just itâs not clear as to who is receiving payment.
I thought Canonical took payments for store purchases, paypal doesnât really say.
If an app cannot be installed through the normal way, then it should not be trusted. I have uninstalled snapd, snap folder, ubuntu core etc in any Ubuntu (and derivatives).
These are the paid Apps. Do not type wrong information please
Also Google Play Store and Apple Store does the same right ?
Edit : Forgot to mention Windows Store ⌠and itâs âtelemetryâ and those buil-in Disney Apps
Dude wake up
How is this different from installing spotify or slack and needing to pay them for additional / premium services?
Iâd argue that we shouldnât use these proprietary services as models here
Whether the source is open or not for a specific destribution platform doesnât change the nature of commercial software. Naturally thereâll be some cultural conflict in some elements of the community as developers bring more commercial software to linux. But, whether itâs games or AutoCAD or Adobe stuff, thereâs a lot of stuff out there that people want to pay for and use which could have a home on linux, finally, as the snap store matures and continues to gain traction.
Nobody is forcing you to install the application
Sure, I didnât even want to do so What I meant was that only allowing a single method of payment using a single account is dangerous IMHO, especially if it isnât libre.
My question was simply about the method of sale or in the case of my example, a pseudo sale.
In Canonicalâs Terms & Conditions for snap devâs it says they will handle the sale of snaps in their store.
(- and subtract 20-30% commissions
Has this changed and snap devâs can seek payment by any method they choose?
As I said before can you file this on store - snapcraft.io please? Thatâs where the snappy devs and users hang out (though thereâs obviously considerable overlap here).
Agreed. Are the âpaid for snapsâ separated from the regular ones? If not they should be listed in their own category that clearly lists âPaid Snapsâ.
Paid snaps (through Canonical infrastructure) is coming. Until then, itâs not unreasonable for application developers to use other 3rd party payment services.
It is not unreasonable to ask for payments for a product. We pay for everything we use, except maybe the Linux distro. The whole idea of the open source dies, when paid apps starts arriving - something has to be blocked somewhere in the app, so a (geeky ?) user wonât be able to see it, and change it - Pay for unlocking. There could be some other stuff also hidden in those locked apps.
I know you said âopen sourceâ here, but âfree softwareâ (an even stricter concept) means free as in free speech, not as in free beer.
Tales of MajâEyal (which, at the moment, you can get for no money with snap install talesofmajeyal
) is on Steam for ÂŁ5 (with some DLC too!) and is free and open-source, whatâs wrong with the developer trying to get funding that way?
Itâs fine! I think we should use a concept similar to elementaryOS here. Free (as in Freedom) Software & Donations via Pay-What-You-Want
Personally I have no issues with non-free (as in beer) apps on the store - As long as itâs indicated as such before one installs any commercial snap. No one wants surprises after the install which IMO, wouldnât reflect well on Canonical.
Cheers.
Proprietary software is allowed in the snap store, if you want to contest that you can make a controversial topic on forum.snapcraft.io but given Ubuntu, at least, allows proprietary software in its store (included in the restricted and multiverse repositories as well as in the optional Canonical Partners repository), I donât think your proposal would be accepted! Also I donât think itâs right to enforce pay-what-you-want, developers should be able to charge what they like, but again, make a topic on store - snapcraft.io asking for it to be made an option! It was mentioned in this long (now closed) topic, but a topic just asking for pay-as-you-want might be more successful.
I think some JetBrains IDEs are free on the snap store but require a licence to be used once installed?
Perhaps there should be a micro-payments flag in software centres? Perhaps the store should surface this (so that software centres can display that flag)? If this sounds like a good idea someone should start a topic on store - snapcraft.io, thanks!