I mostly NACKd the request, as I don’t think the importance of the bug is high enough to grant adding Ubuntu delta. However I asked the @bluca to provide more info if he thinks I underestimate the importance of the bug.
Handover context: @bluca is likely to provide more info, we should look at the bug/MP again.
postgresql-14 LP: #1953128 bot recently decided attachment was a debdiff, even though it was already sponsored in 2021, marked the attachment ‘not a patch’ and unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors
fontconfig MP 461026 already sponsored, claimed the review and marked ‘Approve’
LP: #2054832: was already sponsored. Removed ubuntu-sponsors and marked bug as fix committed.
LP: #2054681: post-FF console-setup merge from debian. Marked as incomplete. Left comments in the linked MP.
LP: #2055088: incomplete. Very poor bug description for someone who is not familiar with the desktop packages structure (me) to understand. UPDATE: looks good, but this needs an MP against the upstream project (this is a native package with VCS elsewhere), and then an ubuntu upload.
LP: #2049217: asked some questions in the MP and marked as incomplete.
LP: #2054151: synced from debian, is in noble-proposed, adjusted bug tasks and unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors
ppa-purge DEB822 fix: nice, and I was hit by this bug multiple times in my workflow. Left a suggestion to add some logging. Cringe, this is an old package, claims to be native, but has ubuntu suffix. Pretending I didn’t see it… UPDATE: sponsored
LP: #2047298: fix for a package that is in noble-proposed since October 2023. I’m reluctant to sponsor it without a few more checks, since it will trigger a mini transition (one rdep only, but still). Left a comment in the bug.
LP: #2054477: needs an FFe now. Left instructions and unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors.
LP: #2052575 – debdiffs don’t contain anything useful as it’s a binary-blob package; requested PPA/git repo with proper packaging source. Targetted, but left marked incomplete
LP: #1971094 – another excellent submission from Sudip, patch looks good, SRU template is well filled in; sponsored
LP: #2047298 – I think @vpa1977’s proposed MP looks a slightly neater fix here; started a PPA (ppa:waveform/ghdl) to try out Andreas’ suggestion of a test-build of yosys-plugin-ghdl with the proposed ghdl
LP: #2029314 – looked at the SRU patches; all looks good but the noble build’s being affected by the t64 work; not much more to do here until some of that clears
LP: #2043448 – autopkgtest needs some work, licensing probably needs revising to GPL-3; unsubscribed sponsors until ready for review again
LP: #2039036 – packaging needs some small tweaks (version, changelog, one entry in copyright), but small enough that I’m just going to do them during sponsorship, assuming nothing else pops out at me
LP: #2052575: bug was marked incomplete but sponsors still subscribed. Unsubscribed sponsors to take it off list until comments addressed.
LP: #2051895: previous review comments addressed, sponsored to noble. Marked incomplete for stable series, pending improvement of the test case.
LP: #2047298: sponsored, clear case of a bugfix for a build failure in noble-proposed.
LP: #2054390: per submitter, blocked awaiting upstream feedback on the patch. Marked incomplete.
new openssl point release: commented that this should be deferred until after t64 transition. Have since retracted this comment privately, since time_t is going to take a while to settle out.
I avoided going over the items that were SRUs, since they would likely just come up again in unapproved where I would have to excuse myself from a review there, had I sponsored them here.
LP: #2053256: lots of commits to review, I added some comments, and asked for a proper MP. And since this is a java package, @vpa19771 could you perhaps please also take a look?
Also unlinked motion from “upstream project” Stop Motion Capture which is nothing to do with motion (it’s a motion detection system, not an animation project)
LP: #2052575 – reviewed, but the missing mantic upload looks like a blocker
black LP bug: This was sponsored already, but since there are tasks for other packages it stays in our report but nothing to sponsor.
cvise LP bug: Reviewed the proposed changes and they look good, but I was not able to sponsor the upload because of some issues in the archive. The next patch pilot can try to sponsor this one.
rocm-hipamd LP bug - NEW package: I had an issue when trying to build the package due to the archive changes happening right now. Someone could take a look at it again, maybe things get sorted out.
nauty MP: Marked it as disapprove since the proposed changes is already in noble-proposed, applied by the Debian maintainer.
libgnomeprint LP bug: This is an old bug and I do not know if someone is actively working on that. I unsubscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors since there is nothing to be sponsored AFAICS.