Netbooting the live server installer

It is still available, the path was renamed to legacy

1 Like

OK thank you. Makes me wonder about 22.04 though!

1 Like

Then we will switch to Debian. Their mini.iso also supports both BIOS and UEFI.


Several people have expressed their disappointment with this, but I have a unique form of disappointment. A few years ago, I was experimenting with making a netbook into a distraction-free writing machine, and the mini.iso fit the bill so well. All I had to do was install it without a graphical environment, and it was good to go. It even went to sleep when the lid closed, with no tweaking, something no other distro did without a graphical environment. I never did write about my findings in this regard, and maybe it’s a good thing I didn’t, since this nifty little trick won’t be around anymore.

1 Like

Ok, but the new live server installer also installs a system without a graphical environment. Have you tried it for your use case? It sounds to me like you’ve assumed it wouldn’t work for your use case but I know of no reason why that would be the case.

A post was split to a new topic: Server Options

First of all, I have to thank all of you people for your work. I’ve be using Ubuntu for years.

But let me see if I get it right.

I have a xen pool and now, to set up a vm, instead of just doing a minimal Ubuntu Server install using mini.iso I’ll have to set up a DHCP/bootp and tftp to use a 908MB iso?

I’m with the people who are complaining about this.


The mini.iso is a locally booted iso image. If you were using this before, I don’t see any reason why you would change to use a netboot setup instead of locally booting the current server iso. This thread is about how to netboot with the new installer, it is not saying that you have to netboot with the new installer.

1 Like

I see. I couldn’t find the link to the new mini.iso file in the repository and read all that discussion about the lack of a mini.iso in this release. Could you provide the link?

1 Like

I didn’t mention a new mini.iso file, I suggested using the current server iso ( The mini.iso has never been a supported method of installing Ubuntu.

We do still provide a mini.iso image for 20.04 at but expect to drop this in the 20.10 cycle.

1 Like

Thank you for the link.

I really liked being able to select for my installation Just enough OS (JeOS) at the start of the old d-i based method. I don’t want all these “standard” base items from Ubuntu; I want a partitioned disk, default networking working, sudo capable user, and SSH server. Everything else I want to be able to add. This makes a much better foundation for making all those streaming/containerized/golden/cloud images that are touted. The alternative is taking the base installation and working too hard to rip out extra.

It can’t be much burden to maintain a choice that does less.


I have a need within my organization to make Ubuntu 20.04 work within our existing environment (a Cobbler server running on Redhat). I cannot do this without a netboot image-the mininmal image won’t boot on raw hardware into an efi environment.

I’m a huge supporter of Ubuntu normally, but I find myself very disappointed when Canonical makes these kinds of decisions that remove features that were provided previously…

1 Like

I’m not especially familiar with UEFI netboot, but it should be possible to boot the live server installer this way. Have you tried that?

It’s definitely something we need to document properly.

Yes, Cobbler won’t properly import the Ubuntu Live image (it has to import the .iso image). My guess is that it’s expecting to serve up files where the Ubuntu Live image wants to hand out a url…I’ve got a separate question open to the cobbler user forum over this, but in the past, the answer with Ubuntu has always been “don’t use the live CD!”

Ah, I’ve no experience with cobbler unfortunately.

Providing the mini.iso for so long automatically implies that it was supported. As you can see in this thread that it was a very popular method (I myself am affected as I have been using it since 2010). Lets face it, the removal of it affects a lot of users and its overall a bad idea and Canonical needs to listen more to the communities requests. I am switching to debian for now.

1 Like

Hi All,

I follwoed the OP and manged to PXE boot the liveCD, this is installing onto a Virtual Machine, but during the installer i get an error

'2020-06-26 12:09:31,765 ERROR root:39 finish: subiquity/InstallProgress/curtin_install: FAIL: Command '['systemd-cat', '--level-prefix=false', '--identifier=curtin_log.16470', '/snap/subiquity/1772/usr/bin/python3', '-m', 'curtin', '--showtrace', '-c', '/var/log/installer/subiquity-curtin-install.conf', 'install']' returned non-zero exit status 3.
2020-06-26 12:09:31,765 ERROR subiquitycore.controller.installprogress:134 curtin_error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/snap/subiquity/1772/lib/python3.6/site-packages/subiquity/controllers/", line 307, in install
    await self.curtin_install(context)
  File "/snap/subiquity/1772/lib/python3.6/site-packages/subiquity/controllers/", line 91, in decorated
    await meth(self, subcontext, *args)
  File "/snap/subiquity/1772/lib/python3.6/site-packages/subiquity/controllers/", line 287, in curtin_install
    self.logged_command(curtin_cmd), check=True)
  File "/snap/subiquity/1772/lib/python3.6/site-packages/subiquitycore/", line 85, in arun_command
    raise subprocess.CalledProcessError(proc.returncode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['systemd-cat', '--level-prefix=false', '--identifier=curtin_log.16470', '/snap/subiquity/1772/usr/bin/python3', '-m', 'curtin', '--showtrace', '-c', '/var/log/installer/subiquity-curtin-install.conf', 'install']' returned non-zero exit status 3.
2020-06-26 12:09:31,766 INFO subiquity.core:438 saving crash report 'install failed crashed with CalledProcessError' to /var/crash/1593173371.766197443.install_fail.crash

has anyone got this or have any suggestions


I have several question

  1. The mini.iso doesn’t work for focal at the moment since there is a kernel update in the repo and the mini.iso didn’t get updated. Please provide an update for the iso.

  2. Why would it be dropped? We just want to build our custom iso for our remix, desktop amd64 image, on top of netboot install. That’s what is recommended in the wiki. We don’t want server iso since it is over 800 MB and netboot iso is just 70MB. It doesn’t make sense to use server.iso for desktop remix in the first place. So my question is
    Does Ubuntu discourages people building custom remix iso on top of Ubuntu ? If so why ?

  3. My second question brings the third point. AFAIK mini.iso is created simply executing a script, getting kernel, generating inirtd, compressing file system and all that. Is it possible to generate the iso on my local system ? Actually I don’t even need the iso, only tar.gz so that I can boot directly boot it from hard-disk.

I found several old guide based on debian but not a single one on Ubuntu. Can you provide a small guide for Ubuntu?

If it is feasible may be community can take it over and continue providing mini.iso.



Where in the Ubuntu wiki do you find this recommendation?

It certainly doesn’t, but neither does the mini.iso, so I’d like to know where this is written and fix it since that is not a method that I’m aware has ever been endorsed by the Ubuntu development team.

We do not discourage this, but there are other methods for doing this customization. LiveCDCustomization - Community Help Wiki

It is built as part of the debian-installer package build. The debian-installer package is not going to be supported by the Ubuntu archive in groovy and forward.