Finally. ![]()
I have not seen/detected any of the malware we previously saw, since I published this blog post on 17th January.
https://blog.popey.com/2026/01/malware-purveyors-taking-over-published-snap-email-domains/
Hi Alan,
Whatβs causing snapd to not be detected as vulnerable?
https://snapscope.popey.com/package/snapd
Your scanner checks for vulnerable libraries included in the snaps or the CVE linked to the snap itself or both?
Ok I missed the point maybe. The deb snapd package is critical here, not the snap one?
I just report what grype finds.
grype snapd --distro=ubuntu:22.04
β Pulled image β Downloaded snap snapd@stable (amd64) β Indexed file system PMrrV4ml8uWuEUDBT8dSGnKUYbevVhc4_26382.snap
β Cataloged contents a4cfa267ed4a4ed379a3ecd7356f6a9a82383a3dfee0fd9d9969a32aea95e385
βββ β Packages [17 packages]
βββ β File metadata [1 locations]
βββ β Executables [311 executables]
βββ β File digests [1 files]
β Scanned for vulnerabilities [0 vulnerability matches]
βββ by severity: 0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, 0 low, 0 negligible
βββ by status: 0 fixed, 0 not-fixed, 0 ignored
No vulnerabilities found
What could be misleading is that the site scans the current versions of snaps. It could benefit from re-running the grype scan on the old syft sboms for previous releases. Iβll look into it. Could be a lot of processing.
2 posts were split to a new topic: Snap βdesktop-security-centerβ has bad plugs or slots
oHi,
Some package seems to fail scan ; it returns no vulnerabilities.
e.g. Chromium:
https://snapscope.popey.com/package/chromium
I use this snap inside mine and chromium vulnerabilities are well returned:
https://snapscope.popey.com/scan/684223
Same things with ffmpeg, β¦ etc
https://snapscope.popey.com/package/ffmpeg-2404
Thanks for your work <3
