not to forget that you give a random dude or gal 100% root access to your system by adding a PPA … 
6 Likes
I understand your concern, but to me it looks like you are not capable to understand what sandboxed and universal packages can give back.
3 Likes
I have already said it many times: universal packages like flatpak, snap or appimage can be interesting for software that are difficult to install in normal times but this is not the case for known software like LibreOffice, Chromium, Firefox etc…
I understand that you don’t want to change your mind about Chromium but at least I hope that in the future you won’t impose new software as a default snap package in future versions of Ubuntu.
It would be nice not to make the same mistake as Chromium with other software, i.e. not to remove a deb package and replace it by force with a universal package.
It’s your own opinion, we read you fine the first time, it’s getting very tiring to read your anti-change-things-were-perfect-before-and-must-not-changes rant every day. Discourse is a place where we aim at having constructive discussions about the work happening on Ubuntu, it’s not an user forum. Can you please move on to have those ‘what-I-think’ statements posted somewhere else so we can go back to have technical exchanges?
Thanks
12 Likes
I think that great would be providing Flatpak support by-default in Ubuntu 20.04 or at least providing up-to-date Flatpak package during the LTS lifecycle (Flatpak support can already be easily enabled by searching for “flatpak”, then installing a Flatpak add-on for the Software app, but Flatpak package itself is outdated; using a PPA is not a good solution suitable for regular users).
2 Likes
(not sarcastic) This could be a case where a snap is useful, to keep something always updated. So, how about snapping flatpack?
Reminds me of a joke my friend said years ago, “I Bing Google. I Google Yahoo. I Yahoo Bing”
Get rid of Nautilus. One of the worst file manager that I aver used.
That is my only request.
Thank you
With all due respect I find it a bit unfair to forcibly test snap technology on users when you’re aware of their slow performance and theming issues. I mean, you know it, but you care to test rather than provide a flawless experience. That’s a bad Microsoft-like practice.
What’s the problem with debs by default, but snaps for those who purposefully want to test this technology? A matter of dialogue window or a switcher in Software setting?
I see a rationale behind your explanation regarding the inclusion of Gnome Tweak, but Snaps-by-default-from-Store is pretty much the same. Even more: snaps are configured to frustrate user’s experience by default, but Tweak tool first should be deliberately fiddled with in order to devastate user’s desktop.
I’m just trying to find logic here.
I think perhaps you’re living on a different planet from the rest of us if you think the entire Linux desktop ecosystem is a panacea of perfection, and this wart called “snap” is the only blight.
Wake up call time! There are bugs all over every application shipping by default in Ubuntu for years. Same for every distro. Let’s not sugar coat this.
There are some bugs in a non-default application on a non-LTS release of Ubuntu. We are working on fixing those bugs so users who arrive on the 20.04 LTS have less of a bad day than the adventurous types who ride the 6-monthly wave of non-LTS releases.
We have had some engineers working on this, there’s a thread started recently on the snap specific forum. I’m sorry to punt you over there, but that’s where the snapd and snapcraft engineers hang out. Apologies.
“debs by default” means engineering time has to be spent making the deb in order to deliver it in the distro. I have explained why the snap exists in some detail, frankly and honestly, on our blog. I apologise if you’ve seen it before. It does detail why.
https://ubuntu.com/blog/chromium-in-ubuntu-deb-to-snap-transition
It isn’t the same at all.
Tweak tool can render your desktop unusable, like black-screen-no-desktop unusable. Just by pressing a few buttons. Nobody needs that. Nobody wants to arrive at work on a Monday after fiddling around with settings on Friday and find they can’t do their job. That sucks.
A non-default browser on a non-LTS release, which is a bit slow to start sometimes and has some other bugs which we need to fix, isn’t in the same ballpark.
I hope I have found some for you.
7 Likes
Oh, I’ve never had an intention to do that.
The point is, snaps are useful as a way to deliver apps that are not available or hard to get otherwise. But providing Gnome Calculator snap, which is obviously (true for all snaps) slower than regular app packaged as deb, is … what? I don’t know. Tech showcase? Deb version is still available in repos, what’s the purpose then? Anyone can compare launch time for each of them.
To me your reply sounds like there’s a HUGE and SCARY bug in Calculator app’s deb package and that’s why it should be substituted with Snap analogue for the God’s sake. Sorry I didn’t mean chromium that you’ve mentioned as “non-default browser”. I was talking about pre-installed apps like Calculator or Chars.
Anyway, thanks for the explanation and links, I guess I will find time to read them all in order to not feel like a silly sausage. 
I think it’s time to end this meandering thread.
Folks, “wish list” threads are usually hijacked by one or two items on the list (like this one was), the rest of the list quickly forgotten in the noise.
Please try to keep threads to a single topic.
4 Likes