I came across this information via an article in issue 227.
Not wishing to open up a turbulent hornet’s nest, I just thought that the info is worth a quick perusal.
There are several threads in here touching that topic already (and due to the nature of it either in slow mode already or closed) …
TLDR: this is nothing the community can do much about but a matter for the Canonical legal team who are still reviewing the whole thing. I assume once they are done there will be a public statement …
2 Likes
Indeed, yes, completely understood.
Yet, it is interesting, even informative to read how other organisations are approaching the question.
As @ogra pointed out, this discussion is not currently taking place here on Discourse.
Once decisions have been made by Canonical, I am sure there will be plenty to talk about.
Legal matters or proposals by other parties are not within our purview here.
For an interesting perspective, see here.
1 Like
You should probably have mentioned that in your intro 
(I didn’t click the link first and thought you just wanted to start another discussion on the topic, the link is indeed informative)
Topic title changed to reflect the content of the link provided in post no. 1
3 Likes