New issue detected. Every time I reboot, it automatically logs me out from https://discourse.ubuntu.com/ or launchpad.net. I have to re-login every time. Gmail stays logged-in though. Is this a known issue ?
I’m not aware of any reported issues but I regularly visit Launchpad, Discourse or the Ubuntu Forums and occasionally find that I am not automatically logged in as expected.
As this also affects Firefox and Google Chrome I’m not seeing this as an issue specific to the snap version of Chromium which I am currently using on Ubuntu and Ubuntu MATE 19.10.
Terribly slow first startup of Chromium after logging in
Can you please quantify how slow? A simple stopwatch measurement would be useful, and if you can run the snap with
snap run --trace-exec chromiumthen close the window and share the terminal output that would be even more useful.
Slow as in somewhere in the range of 3-7 seconds. In my previous installation Chromium would show up on screen in less than a second. And it is not only after logging in but often also when reopening a Chromium window after having shut down all previous ones. Even my libreoffice-writer/calc (not the snappy ones) start up in a fraction of what Chromium takes now.
My Dell XPS13 laptop of about 5 years old has a modest i7-3537U CPU @ 2.00GHz but coupled with the SSD it still used to be fast enough for my daily work.
File save/open dialogs do not use the proper theming
This is [bug #1791307](link removed).
Please see blow…
Funky home directory in the same dialogs
This is [bug #1798450](link rmoved).
Please see below…
All my saved login-credentials are gone so I have had to go through a number of tedious password reset sessions
Can you check whether the
password-manager-serviceinterface is connected? (
snap interfaces chromium | grep password)
Parts of recent state keeps getting lost between browser restarts. Sometimes it is simply browser history but I also lost recently created bookmarks on at least two occasions
This is most likely because an update happened under your feet. I concurr this is very annoying, and currently being actively worked on. Can you test the instructions at ? This works for me, and I’d be interested in hearing whether it does for you too.
Even if that would works I don’t want that. I want to do my own updates in my own time. Snaps should hold off all updates until I use the Software updater or something similar.
9 processes called Chrome when I open 1 Chromium window
Chromium’s architecture relies on multiple sandboxed processes for security. This is not specific to the snap. How is that a problem? Is it the name (“chrome” VS “chromium”) that’s bothering you?
Actually this is a mistake on my part, these processes where indeed there. The unexpected name has probably thrown me off.
a load of file system mounts when Chromium is running
Do you mean snaps that are mounted under
That’s not specific to chromium, but an implementation specificy of snapd.
Yes, I know that but that does not make it less annoying. Just another way snaps are sticking out.
Gnome shell extensions plugin no longer works because it does not detect chrome-gnome-shell
This is [bug #1741074](link removed).
I understand some of the issues I have are more snap related than snap-Chromium related. But that does not make it any better for me. For a number of reasons I am obliged to keep up with the latest Ubuntu version and 19.10 is only weeks away. The assurance that this transition will not be back-ported to previous Ubuntu releases until major issues have been resolved does not help me at all. I need a Ubuntu 19.10 with a properly working Chromium.
In the meantime I have moved to Debian testing because of this. Luckily I have a separate / and /home partition and keeping /home worked like a charm. So far I have no issues with this setup, although I do miss some of the Ubuntu-niceness. To boot my Chromium browser once again opens in a flash.
BTW: I removed all links because I was not allowed to post this otherwise.
Just wanted to share some feedback myself. I installed the Chromium snap under Ubuntu 19.10. Contrary to other reports, the application launch speed is normal for me. The first one took a second or two, but I assume that probably has to do with some snap-related initialization. The following launches were instant, though I am on an SSD.
The themeing is actually working well under X11, except for save dialogs and the fact that it is outdated (right click menu shows grey highlights rather than orange). It is close under Wayland as well, but unfortunately the titlebar is Adwaita rather than Yaru for some reason. Also under Wayland there are issues such as lack of font hinting, and for Firefox in particular, an incorrect cursor (white rather than black), so it seems all XWayland applications have some regressions there.
Other than the theme issues, the Chromium snap seems to be working as expected. Let me know if there is something else that I can test.
My dmesg gets flooded with
[114081.618847] audit: type=1400 audit(1568277508.541:17300): apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“open” profile=“snap.chromium.chromium” name="/home/baz/snap/chromium/849/.config/chromium/Default/QuotaManager-journal" pid=3281 comm=“ThreadPoolForeg” requested_mask=“w” denied_mask=“w” fsuid=1000 ouid=1000
[114086.472544] audit: type=1400 audit(1568277513.397:17354): apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“truncate” profile=“snap.chromium.chromium” name="/home/baz/snap/chromium/849/.config/chromium/Default/Favicons-journal" pid=3281 comm=“Chrome_HistoryT” requested_mask=“w” denied_mask=“w” fsuid=1000 ouid=1000
[114087.314067] audit: type=1400 audit(1568277514.237:17355): apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“open” profile=“snap.chromium.chromium” name="/home/baz/snap/chromium/849/.config/chromium/Default/Cookies-journal" pid=3749 comm=“ThreadPoolForeg” requested_mask=“wc” denied_mask=“wc” fsuid=1000 ouid=1000
I’m using the Chromium Snap Edge version 79.0.3921.0
It seems it was updated very recently, and I noticed that the ‘simple HTML view’ or reader view if you will, is now missing from the Omni Bar. This was a feature I often used and miss it. Why was it removed?
Just to update this post for those that might be searching for a solution:
The manual setting of the Flag for the ‘Page Distiller’ feature, was reset to the default. So, once enabled, I had my “reader” view back. More on the ‘Page Distiller’ here.
If the issue is that they don’t want to use snaps, then yes, there’s no point. But if that refusal is motivated by real technical concerns, then we would like to hear about them.
As an extension developer, one thing that snap completely lacks is usable access to the Native Messaging API due to snap’s aggressive sandboxing, this breaks basically all binaries that depend on libraries chromium does not. Two examples are the native binaries for my own Pass Companion and BrowserPass, this has been a known issue for a long time and as far as I’m aware, the resolution for this scenario either has no fix or is poorly documented.
I have two ways to start Chromium.
Below is snap-Chromium. Starting from app grid, it takes a while to start and has not-very-pretty light colour bar on top.
The 2nd Chromium is the standalone one, shown below, taken off the snap and placed in my home folder and the executive file run with Gmrun. It starts almost immediately and correctly takes the system theme - Yaru-dark.
Now, I’d create a desktop file, so it can be placed permanently in the favourites. And the snap one taken off the app grid. For the moment, it runs off Gmrun.
All web browsers are standalone, so a snap is not needed for them. All you need is to make a desktop file to run the executive and a link to it. It might be easy to create a deb out of the standalone Chromium.
Note: Just ran that executive file from the Linux Mint (Eoan), and it correctly read the system theme there too. Mint doesn’t have snaps, only flatpaks.
Maybe, you’d consider creating a deb file, @oSoMoN ?
I even opened this same Chromium from Arch Linux.
The snap Chromium is 607.3 MB
The standalone Chromium is 237.2 MB
Something serious to think about.
EDIT: See, if you can install libcanberra-gtk3-module to snap-chromium >> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-3.0/modules/ Maybe, it’d start as fast as the standalone one.
Thanks for the report @paulw2u. I can confirm the problem in Xubuntu. It appears that exo-helper ships its own desktop file for chromium. I have yet to try and reproduce the problem for MATE and Kubuntu. Would you mind filing a bug to track the issue?
Previously, you could limit Chromium to only having access to the “Downloads” folder using firejail.
This no longer works:
I’ve submitted a request for a alternative snap installation that achieves the same degree of sandboxing:
I just upgraded to Eaon and was forced to take a snap version of chromium.
I don’t want snaps. Cool if you want to offer the option to people, but don’t force it.
How do we undo this?
There are valid reasons why this has happened. Read through it.
Also, there is no need to ask the same question in two different threads.
If you want the newest Chromium web browser, you can download it from here.
Unzip it and create a symlink of chrome-wrapper to your desktop or create a desktop file.
can you please stop pointing people to a browser download like this …
quoting the first line from the page you liked to:
This is a raw build of Chromium for Linux x64, right off the trunk. It may be tremendously buggy.
note that there are users that might listen to you, not read that line, just download this pile of potential security holes and do homebanking with it … please refrain from mindlessly sending third party download links around that put other people at risk. also note that the binary from this site will explicitly not update at all, so people are stuck with this potentially buggy and/or insecure version.
Everyone has a disclaimer. Even Ubuntu system extensions say they are mock ones. Even the Ubuntu distro, you’d download today would have a disclaimer.
That link, btw, directs you to the Chromium Team, the guys who really creates it. It upgrades every few minutes.
Snap is a repackaging system. Doesn’t create new packages. Or, does it?
If you think, btw that using snaps makes people terribly happy, how about creating a desktop Ubuntu distro entirely out of snaps? I’ll be waiting for it!
no, it obviously does not.
it directs you to a nightly build of the developer tree (trunk) of chromium, completely without any QA, bug fixes or security …
please stop posting such links and stop putting other people at risk by pointing them to potentially malicious builds of third party apps.
note that nobody will complain if you point to some stable build of the app, but this is explicitly a developer playground build out of trunk with known and unknown bugs and security holes.
Your snaps don’t have bugs, such as notoriously getting late to start?
Aren’t snaps too trunk? Who is checking the performance of snaps?
Can you create a fully snap desktop distro?
Or, are the snaps only for those devices, you mentioned elsewhere, but not for the desktop?
Chromium snap is terribly slow to start. But the ever updating “trunk” Chromium starts in a jiffy. I even installed it in Windows 10.