A new Ubuntu wiki, Part 1: Announcement

:postal_horn: The new wiki is now available
Since this blog was posted, the new wiki has gone live at https://wiki.ubuntu.com .
You can log in with your Ubuntu One account start editing right away.
A launch announcement is scheduled for later today.

Over many years, the wiki became an important hub of Ubuntu information, thanks to incredible contributions from community members and volunteers. Content creators, editors, and moderators all worked together to share their knowledge and skills. Just like the old wiki, we’ll need community members to make the new Ubuntu wiki a source of high quality information.

In future project updates, we’ll let you know of ways that you can get involved, so stay tuned!

:books: Posts in the Ubuntu wiki project series

  1. Announcing the project to make a new wiki :backhand_index_pointing_left:
  2. Overview of features in the new wiki
  3. How the wiki relates to other content platforms
  4. Making public archives of the old Ubuntu wikis
  5. Pre-launch update

Background of the wiki project

The Ubuntu wiki is scheduled to be decommissioned in August 2026.

In fact, two public Ubuntu wikis will be decommissioned:

Until recently, there was even a third wiki at canonical.wiki.com, for internal use at Canonical.

In anticipation of the decommissioning of the public wikis, a small team at Canonical have been working on setting up a new Ubuntu wiki.

History of the wiki

The Ubuntu wiki was born in 2004, the same year that Warty Warthog was released. Over the course of 20+ years, it was built by the combined efforts of many contributors.

This wiki alone has tens of thousands of pages, spanning developer discussions, meeting minutes, membership applications, technical documentation, and more.

In recent years, however, the wiki has become less reliable as a way to find and share information.

Problems with the wikis

The current wikis have issues relating to:

  • Content: The wikis are filled with outdated information that is not useful to most users. Users sometimes find old wiki pages instead of up-to-date versions in the official Ubuntu documentation. A lot of the most popular pages have been migrated to official documentation already, including the Ubuntu project documentation.
  • Security: The wikis are built with a version of the MoinMoin wiki platform that is still on Python 2. This means that the wikis no longer receive important security patches.
  • Identity: The wikis have served multiple functions, several of which are now handled by other platforms. We use Discourse for discussions, Read the Docs for official documentation, and the Canonical library for internal documentation. In this context, it has become less obvious what purpose the wikis have.
  • Usability: The wikis have become difficult to use. Users have issues registering and logging in. Page loads can be slow. The styling of the wikis is not up to modern web standards and the wikis can perform poorly on mobile.
  • Two wikis: There is no obvious reason for having two distinct Ubuntu wikis. It is unclear when we should use one rather than the other. Ideally, there would be a single, good community wiki.

Current status of the wiki project

At Canonical, a small cross-team effort is involved in setting up the new Ubuntu wiki. It is a collaboration between technical authors, platform engineers, community engineers, designers, and Ubuntu engineers.

We are working on a remote instance of the wiki that we are using for initial testing and configuration. It is in the early stages of development and is not yet publicly available. We are targeting an Alpha release of the wiki in 2026 and will consult with the community during the process.

This series

In future posts, we will update you on the development of the Ubuntu wiki, some of the thinking that has gone into the project, and how you can get involved as a community.

Acknowledgements

Much thanks to Robert Kratky (@rkratky), Aaron Prisk (@aaronprisk), and Mauro Gaspari (@ilvipero) for reviewing early versions of this post.

34 Likes

As a wiki expert, and currently looking for my next employment opportunity, I’d love to help.

2 Likes

That’s great that you want to get involved. We’re currently only at an early stage in the wiki project, but community involvement will be key to the new wiki’s success. Please feel free to share whatever insights you may have, and we’ll be sharing more thoughts on how the community can get involved in the near future. All the best.

I have decades of relevant experience dealing with wiki platforms, content migrations, modernization, DevOps, and systems architecture since Ward Cunningham first created the C2 wiki. For example, I was the Technology Services Manager at OASIS when we stood up both MoinMoin wikis and MediaWiki instances for all of the technical committees (TCs) working on the standards at the consortium. I’ve made open source contributions in the 3rd-party MediaWiki space, and led the upgrade of the wiki systems at NASA for the last two major Long-term support (LTS) upgrades. I created multi-platform collaboration services for faculty at Harvard. I led the transformation and migration of wiki services at Fortune 500 enterprises. I would really like to talk with you about how I would be a pivotal member of the team if you could connect with me directly.

1 Like

Thanks Greg, I will contact you directly. For now, feel free to contribute to any subsequent discussions about the Ubuntu wiki, if you are comfortable sharing your ideas openly.

I will like to add a list of recommended (by the community) laptops/desktops on this new wiki.

Following similar concepts from official certified by Canonical (Certified hardware | Ubuntu), the one from ArchLinux (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Category:Laptops), Omarchy (https://learn.omacom.io/3/omacom/74/good-linux-hardware) or Fedora (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/marketing/ready/list/)

And using also direct info from OEM

3 Likes

Feel free to contribute community documentation when the new wiki launches.

4 Likes

Great suggestion @onemorejulian .

I think the new wiki could be a good home for this kind of information.

I will note your suggestion.

1 Like

The first I knew of the original Ubuntu wiki disappearing was today, seeing the message on a page that I had bookmarked.

Tip
If you can’t find a page that was available in an old Ubuntu wiki, an archive is available on GitHub.

The problem with this solution is that the archive is from 7 months ago.

I have been editing the wiki this past week unbeknownst of the impending doom. Where is the archive of this data?

Also, where is the associated archive for the files that were attached to those wiki pages?

Hi Jonathan,

We’ve been communicating about this change for several months, but I appreciate that this is still frustrating for you.

We are also aware that the archive is now several months old; however, please keep in mind that the number of edits on the wiki in the last seven months was vanishingly small. For context, the archive contains material going back over 20 years. 10s of GBs of data. We tried to capture as much of that large volume of data as possible, but there was always the possibility that there would be some edits leading up to the deprecation that would be lost.

Nonetheless, immediately before this migration we requested (internally) a fresh data dump from the old wiki. My intention is to update the archive once I have access. As with most things, there is a delay between requesting the dump and getting it, and we will also need time to extract it and make any updates that are necessary. These data dumps are huge.

So please, accept my sincere apologies for any frustration that this has caused. The reason we are doing this in the first place is because, unlike you, many community members were not editing the wiki or were having difficulty doing so. While this transition might have some annoyances in the initial weeks, the aim is to have a wiki that will be easier to use for many years.

edit:

Also, where is the associated archive for the files that were attached to those wiki pages?

It was not feasible to archive everything from the wiki, including images and attachments, in a manner that was easily searchable for most people (the files in the repo). But the repo also contains release artifacts for both old wikis, downloadable as tarballs. These should contain pretty much everything from the old wiki (images, attachments, etc.) but obviously require extracting and are large in size.

2 Likes

Note the URL in the original post is deprecated, it is linking to staging. (And the wiki start page itself is linking to this discussion)

1 Like

I know. That’s work for today (the links only changed recently).

1 Like

Links should be updated on Discourse now @digidoc .

On the link to this discussion from the homepage, that is intentional, to provide people with context if they haven’t been following the announcements.

However, I am preparing a launch announcement for today. Once that goes live on Discourse, I will update the link on the homepage to point to that announcement.

3 Likes

While we get a new data dump, which may take a good while, the old wiki is technically still up; you can access it by adding the line 91.189.91.49 wiki.ubuntu.com to /etc/hosts.

The caveat is that you should not treat this as a supported method of accessing the old wiki. I highly recommend that you use this to only fetch what old information you need instead of continuing to use the old wiki. At some point in the near future, the old wiki services will go down for good without notice, and this method will no longer work.

2 Likes

This method worked. I was able to get all of the content.

Thank you very much.

1 Like

For posterity, the plaintext archive of the two old wikis has been updated (as of 23rd September, 2026 - a day after the launch) with edits that were made during the period between the announcement of the deprecation of the old wikis and the launch of the new wikis. Updating the tarballs, which contain images, PDFs and other material, but that were also cleansed of spam and junk data, will take longer.

2 Likes